SCRANTON — A prosecutor described Stephanie Tarapchak, D.O., as a liar and a drug smuggler who caused one man’s death — and nearly her daughter’s, too — with her reckless prescription writing.
Her defense attorney said the doctor is the victim of a disorganized office and drug-addicted witnesses angered when she cut them off.
The vastly different takes on the Schuylkill County physician were offered during opening statements in the second day of her trial Tuesday in Lackawanna County Court.
Tarapchak, 46, is accused of several crimes, including sneaking drugs into the Lackawanna County Prison in her rectum when she was ordered there for being in contempt of court, overprescribing powerful pain medication to a man, leading to his death, and Xanax to her daughter, leading her to overdose.
“What this case is about is drugs,” Deputy Attorney General Robert Labar told the jury in his opening statement. “Lots and lots of drugs.”
The state prosecutor noted that the defendant ran a family medical practice in Ashland, not a pain-management clinic. Yet she was prescribing thousands of powerful painkilling opioids such as OxyContin and Percocet.
“The doctor’s role is to be a gatekeeper to that, to prevent people from getting addicted,” LaBar said. “In all aspects, she failed miserably.”
Among many other crimes, the doctor has been charged with drug delivery resulting in death, a first-degree felony, for a patient who overdosed on one of her prescriptions.
In his own opening statement, the court-appointed defense attorney, Bernard Brown, told the jury that both the Schuylkill County coroner and the investigating pathologist ruled the death “accidental.”
The public defender also pointed out that Tarapchak’s office had fallen into disarray after a trusted administrator had left for a time, blaming the prosecution’s claims of the defendant stealing pills on bad bookkeeping.
“If you ask yourself, ‘Is what Dr. Tarapchak did illegal?’ then that’s a reasonable doubt,” he told the jury.
Brown also pre-emptively attacked the credibility of witnesses the attorney general’s office would be calling, including an ex-boyfriend to whom the doctor prescribed drugs.
“Are they somebody you would trust when acting on a matter of the highest importance in your life?” he asked. “Or do they have a motive, a bias, an interest in the outcome of the case?”
Prosecutors began building their case Tuesday by calling a DEA agent who had audited Tarapchak’s medicine stores and found pills missing, leading to the suspension of her license. In his cross-examination, Brown countered that his client was legally prescribing the medication, and the missing pills could have come from theft or disorganization of the office.
The trial will continue today.