A federal proposal to combat climate change drew mixed reactions from Pennsylvania officials, who alternately focused on its environment and public health effects versus its impact on the state’s economy.
The Obama Administration’s final Clean Power Plan, announced Monday, will force carbon dioxide cutbacks in Pennsylvania, an electricity-exporting state whose power plants emit the third-highest amount of carbon dioxide in the U.S. per year, according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data.
The rule is the first in American history targeting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants, the highest-emitting sector in the country. The vast majority of international climate scientists point to carbon dioxide as the most significant of greenhouse gases causing global warming.
The EPA’s final rule will require Pennsylvania to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide pollution per unit of electricity by about 35 percent of 2012 levels by 2030.
The plan offers states the choice of how to meet progressively stringent goals, the first of which takes effect in 2022. Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration must now decide how to implement the plan, a task the governor addressed in a Monday statement.
“My administration is committed to making the Clean Power Plan work for Pennsylvania,” Wolf said. Clean coal, natural gas, solar, wind and other power sources will all be part of his strategy, he said.
State environmental secretary John Quigley said cutting power plant pollution, using lower-emitting natural gas, supporting nuclear plants, adding more renewable energy and improving energy efficiency will all be part of the state’s plan.
Most of Northeast Pennsylvania’s existing electricity generation is already carbon-free. Its largest generator is Talen Energy’s Susquehanna Steam nuclear plant near Berwick. Several local wind farms and the hydroelectric plant at Lake Wallenpaupack recently spun off from PPL also provide energy with no emissions.
However, three large natural gas-fired power plants are proposed or under construction in the region, including a 1,500-megawatt plant in Jessup. Much smaller electricity generators at Keystone Sanitary Landfill and PEI Power Corp.’s Archbald station emit carbon dioxide when they burn landfill gas. UGI also operates a small natural gas plant near Hunlock Creek in Luzerne County.
Northeast Pennsylvania’s federal legislators reactions to the plan largely followed party lines.
In November, Democratic Sen. Bob Casey submitted a 22-page comment commending the EPA’s purpose and intent but urging the agency to not unfairly burden Pennsylvania with renewable energy mandates relative to other states.
On Monday, Republican Sen. Pat Toomey praised coal through a spokesperson as a “domestically sourced, low-cost form of energy which helps sustain jobs for Pennsylvania and beyond.”
“Nevertheless, the Obama administration continues to implement policies that will make energy more expensive for hard-working Pennsylvanians while destroying good, family-sustaining jobs,” he said.
In his own statement, U.S. Rep. Matt Cartwright, D-17, Moosic, said the plan would “protect public health, invest in clean, renewable energy development, boost energy efficiency measures and lower electric bills in the long run.”
U.S. Rep. Lou Barletta, R-11, Hazleton, said in a statement that Pennsylvania “will be a clear loser” under this plan, which could place its 36,000 coal jobs at risk.
U.S. Rep. Tom Marino, R-10, Williamsport, is still reviewing the full text of the 1,560-page rule, released this afternoon, spokesman Ryan Shucard said.
“But if the EPA’s history, especially under this administration, shows us anything, it’s a bad rule,” he said in an email.
The EPA made several tweaks to Pennsylvania’s requirements after a six-month public comment period, slightly relaxing interim and final cutback goals compared to those first proposed in June 2014. The agency also updated its estimate of Pennsylvania’s 2012 emissions based on public comments.
The EPA will publish the final rule Sept. 4 in the Federal Register. The state Department of Environmental Protection plans to announce details about public hearings across the state soon.
As the governor and DEP create the plan, the state Public Utility Commission will study its effect on utilities and consumers, Chairman Gladys M. Brown said in a statement. The agency will also study how the rules interact with state programs, including Pennsylvania’s alternative energy portfolio standards that require electric utilities to draw power from a certain percentage of alternative energy.
Pennsylvania’s initial plan is due June 30, 2016.