Quantcast
Channel: News from republicanherald.com
Viewing all 30310 articles
Browse latest View live

FCI/Schuylkill inmate charged with escape

$
0
0

A federal grand jury in Scranton has indicted the man who prosecutors allege walked away in March 2018 from Federal Correctional Institution/Schuylkill, U.S. Attorney David J. Freed said Thursday.

Raymond Collazo, 33, faces a charge of escaping from custody, Freed said.

The grand jury handed down its indictment of Collazo on Tuesday.

Prosecutors allege that Collazo absconded on the afternoon of March 15, 2018, from the minimum security satellite prison camp at FCI/Schuylkill in Butler Township, northwest of Minersville. Collazo has since been recaptured, according to prosecutors.

Collazo had been serving 130 months behind bars for possession of 100 grams or more of heroin with intent to distribute, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime.

Collazo faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a term of supervised release following his term behind bars and a fine if he pleads or is found guilty. The sentencing judge could make any sentence consecutive to the one he already is serving.

The U.S. Marshals Service and officers with FCI/Schuylkill investigated the case, which is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Phillip J. Caraballo.

Contact the writer: pbortner@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6014


Fire destroys 6 homes in Ashland

$
0
0

ASHLAND — Six houses were destroyed and four others damaged by a fire fueled by explosions on Brock Street on Thursday, leaving 11 people homeless.

Within minutes after getting the call around 2:45 p.m., firefighters knew they had their work cut out for them, not only to extinguish the flames but also stop the fire from spreading to additional homes.

Ashland Assistant Fire Chief Charles Orth was at his fire company station a short distance away when the fire sirens began to blow.

Orth said he immediately knew the magnitude of the fire before he even got there.

“I saw the smoke and knew it wasn’t good,” he said. “I immediately called in a second alarm.”

With fire blowing out of the front of homes at 1108 through 1114, Orth’s second alarm quickly turned into a third alarm.

Orth said the fire was fueled by several explosions, one of which sent a front window of one of the homes across the street and into a yard.

The source of those explosions was not determined as of Thursday night, but propane is suspected as a possible cause.

Firefighters quickly went into a defensive mode to extinguish the fire that already consumed homes at 1108, 1110, 1112 and 1114 Brock Street. Their efforts to save properties at 1116 and 1118 Brock Street were unsuccessful. Those two structures, one of which is occupied by an Ashland firefighter and his fiancee, caught fire and eventually collapsed along with the remaining four properties.

A home at 1102 Brock St. was damaged by fire along with a home at 1122 Brock St.

Ashland Police Chief Gerard Daley tentatively identified those left homeless by the fire. They are:

• 1108 Brock St.: Paul Sell and Kim Mitchell

• 1110 Brock St.: Ceasar Sanders

• 1112 Brock St.: Mike Wilson

• 1114 Brock St.: Jessica Hettler and Clarence Wetzel

• 1116 Brock St.: Cody Price and Brittany Waizenegger

• 1118 Brock St.: Bob, April and Ciera Waizenegger

Daley was one of the first on scene.

With fire blowing out of several homes, Daley said, he tried to enter 1114 Brock St., the home where the fire is believed to have started, because he was told someone may be inside.

Despite his efforts, the fire was too much.

“I made it onto the front porch but there was an explosion … it blew me right off of the porch,” Daley said. “I thought I was dead.”

Daley said he then went to the rear of a home at 1116 Brock St. and was able to rescue a pet dog.

It was not known if any other animals were inside any of the homes.

Daley said one of the occupants of the affected homes experienced chest pains, but other than that no injuries were reported.

Ashland Fire Chief Phillip Groody directed fire ground operations, assisted by chiefs and assistant chiefs from other departments, and remained at the scene late in the nighttime hours Thursday.

The cause of the fire has not been determined and state police fire marshal Trooper John F. Burns of the Frackville station is expected to be at the scene this morning to sift through the rubble in an attempt to determine what sparked the blaze.

Both Burns and state police criminal investigator Joseph Hall were both at the scene Thursday, but not yet in an official capacity.

The fire interrupted electrical power to several homes in the area of the fire for several hours.

Around 8:30 p.m., PPL crews were on scene trying to re-establish electricity to those affected.

Firefighters from Ashland and Girardville and numerous other companies throughout Schuylkill County responded to the fire, along with firefighters from Mount Carmel.

Contact the writer: fandruscavage@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6013

Program at Schuylkill IU 29 teaches signs of abuse

$
0
0

MAR LIN — “I believe you.” “It’s not your fault.”

Those are responses that parents and caregivers can give to children who are reporting sexual abuse, according to Clarissa Geary, prevention educator with the Sexual Assault Resource & Counseling Center of Schuylkill and Lebanon County.

Geary offered Thursday a “Parents in the Know” program at the Schuylkill Intermediate Unit 29 gymnasium.

During the free program, Geary educated participants about grooming behaviors of child sexual predators, and the skills necessary to intervene with other adults, prevent childhood trauma and create a safer environment for children by stopping the abuse.

Through video scenarios, Geary demonstrated how easily a child could be abducted from a public park; how prisoners who were sexually violent were successful in committing their crimes; and how boys and girls are taught differently about expected social interactions and boundaries.

Many times, a predator is someone who has gained the trust of the child and the child’s family, she said.

She offered several scenarios for the audience to consider, about appropriate boundaries and what to do if someone is a bystander and they see something troubling. “Is it okay for a coach to give a player a high five?” Geary asked.

The audience members, who were mostly paraprofessionals, were also asked if it was alright for a coach to give a hug, or a slap on the bottom as the student athlete heads out onto the field or court.

“No, but I’ve seen it happen at wrestling matches and football games,” one woman said.

Some of the grooming behaviors of an adult sexual predator included:

• Insisting on hugging, tickling, wrestling with the child, especially if the child has said to stop

• Spending too much time alone with the child

• Spending most of their spare time with the child

• Regularly offering to babysit many children for free

• Introducing special attention to the child with gifts or money

• Encouraging unhealthy behaviors, such as drinking alcohol, smoking or looking at pornography

• Destroying the child’s trust in others, saying “No one will believe you if you tell.”

• Undermining the way others view the child

• Isolating the family from the community

Lisa Marsicano, IU 29 special education social services coordinator, introduced Geary and said the IU tries to host a free, community education program each month.

“We’re a consortium here. We receive information from the districts and from the parents who come in for meetings, and they tell us that there’s a need for this,” Marsicano said. Last month’s program was on early childhood intervention, she said.

Parents in the Know “consists of four, two-hour interactive sessions to help parents and guardians build, practice and strengthen skills to prevent child sexual abuse,” according to the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape website, www.pcar.org.

For more information, contact Geary at SARCC, 570-628-2965; or for other free, community programs, contact Marsicano at the IU at 570-544-9131, Ext. 1228.

Contact the writer: ; 570-628-6007

Frackville borough vehicles to use fuel card

$
0
0

FRACKVILLE — All Frackville borough vehicles will now use a purchase card from one company for fuel after action by the borough council at its February meeting.

The borough police department had been using WEX Inc. government fleet cards in the patrol cars for some time with the success of having one type of card for cost and record control.

During his chairman report on the streets committee, Councilman Stephen Tertel asked Police Chief Richard Bell on the WEX card and using the account for other vehicles.

“Chief, we talked about piggybacking with the gas and explain it to Mark about that,” Tertel said, referring to borough solicitor Mark Semanchik.

“All of the police cars have a card in it to purchase gas at any gas stations through WEX,” Bell said. “Each officer is assigned a pin number. So when we go to the pump, we use the card that is in that car. One of the requirements when we put the card in (at the pump) is that it won’t allow us to get gas unless we put the vehicle mileage in and also the officer’s pin number so we can track who’s getting the gas at that time.”

Bell continued, “That is all registered and monthly we receive a bill broken down by card for the amount of gas that we purchased.”

According to Bell, the WEX cards can be used at almost any station, rather than be limited to one company.

“We used to have a card, specifically Turkey Hill, but within the last eight months, the company was sold, and while still using the Turkey Hill name, however the new company that bought them did not want a fleet or gas card (of their own), so then we want with the WEX card, which the Pennsylvania State Police use,” Bell said. “So it’s a fleet card, there is still accountability and requirements for mileage, but that can be used at any gas station throughout the United States. So if we’re doing a prisoner transport and have to go out of the county, we’re able to get gas at any gas station.”

“Is it just limited to law enforcement vehicles, or can it be used with dump trucks and such?” Semanchik asked.

“It can be used for any municipal vehicle,” Bell said. “Our cards are very specific and actually have the license plate number printed on that card. When you register that vehicle, you have to provide registration information, so it’s very easy to track if there is any misuse of the card.”

Tertel motioned to use the same fuel purchase plan as the police department, and the council voted unanimously to add the non-police vehicles to the WEX cards.

In the property committee report, Councilman Russell Cunningham said the committee met with the Frackville Senior Citizens to discuss the senior center.

“We reviewed some property items identified maintenance issues,” Cunningham said. “There was also a question and answer period. It was a very good meeting. I plan to get feedback to them.”

Cunningham also reported that the Schuylkill YMCA wants to run their summer camp in the municipal building’s gymnasium as in previous years, beginning from June 3 through Aug. 16, Monday through Friday. Set-up by the Y will be begin the week of May 27.

The borough council approved the gymnasium use in a voice vote.

The sanitation report for January showed 109.08 tons of garbage collected and disposed at a cost of $6,599,31, and 24.04 tons of recyclables collected. Delinquent garbage accounts collected for January totaled $9,404.53.

Mayor Kim Phillips said the Frackville Recreation Board is holding a “Mud & Makers Pottery” event from 7 to 9 a.m. Feb. 27 at 6 S. Center St., Pottsville. Cost is $35 and preregistration is required at www.mudandmaker.com. Participants will create a set of four tiny tumblers that can be used for shot glasses, boilo glasses, for holding toothpicks, air plants and more. Additional glasses can be made for $5 each. The fundraiser benefits community activities in the Frackville area, such as the Easter egg hunt, Halloween parade, youth Christmas party and more.

Contact the writer: jusalis@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6023

Kline Twp. supervisors want safer walk/bike path

$
0
0

People like to walk Kelayres Road between the Kline Township village and McAdoo.

Since the Kelayres Playground closed in 2018, children are now riding their bikes to the McAdoo Playground, which is part of McAdoo’s recreation complex that includes the Little League field and other play areas.

Township supervisors want to make the walk and bike ride safer, so they are working to build a walking path on the side of the road, between the McAdoo Machine Shop at Fourth and James streets and McAdoo-Kelayres Elementary/Middle School, which is right next to the recreation area.

Supervisor Dale Wesner said the path is needed now.

“Our residents need a safe place to walk,” Wesner said. “More and more people are using that road to go to the Hancock Street playground. The roadway is also heavily used by walkers from McAdoo and Kline Township to maintain their health.”

Wesner said he received notification Tuesday the township is getting a $22,660 grant from the state Department of Environmental Protection for the trail.

“The board (of supervisors) has already approved funding the path,” he said.

Wesner is also on the hunt for materials to build the asphalt path on township right-of-way alongside the road.

“I did get a donation of base material from Northeast Power Co.,” Wesner said. “I talked with PennDOT on Friday and we are working on an easement.”

He has an idea how long the path will be and how much material the township will need to build it. He is still looking for some donations of material for the path.

“My measurements come to just under 2,100 feet,” Wesner said. “Ideally, we desire to level the ground with a base material minimum 4 inches, up to 12 in some areas. The asphalt topcoat should end up being 3 to 4 inches compacted. The width of the path should be about 8 feet.”

Contact the writer: jdino@standardspeaker.com 570-501-3585

Criminal court, Feb. 22, 2019

$
0
0

POTTSVILLE — A Lackawanna County man is headed to state prison after recently admitting to a Schuylkill County judge that he burglarized and tried to set fire to a North Manheim Township home in June 2018.

Michael P. Miller, 41, of Carbondale, formerly of Old Forge, must serve three to six years in a state correctional institution, President Judge William E. Baldwin decided. Baldwin made the prison sentence concurrent with one Miller is serving from Lackawanna County.

Miller pleaded guilty to burglary, risking a catastrophe, recklessly endangering another person and harassment. Prosecutors withdrew charges of criminal trespass and simple assault.

Baldwin also sentenced Miller to pay costs and $50 to the Criminal Justice Enhancement Account, and submit a DNA sample to law enforcement authorities.

State police at Schuylkill Haven charged Miller with entering the garage at 16 Martha Lane at 6:03 p.m. June 17, 2018, grabbing a gasoline can, entering the house and pouring gasoline on the floor.

A man in the house pushed Miller out and a struggle ensued, resulting in Miller knocking the man to the ground, police said. The man’s daughter obtained a handgun and gave it to her father, who shot Miller in his left arm and abdomen, according to police.

Baldwin also accepted guilty pleas from, and, pursuant to agreements between prosecutors and defendants, imposed the indicated sentences on, the following people:

Sarah M. Debenedict, 25, of Tamaqua; driving under the influence and disregarding traffic lane; 15 days house arrest with electronic monitoring, 45 days strict supervision, four months probation, $1,025 in fines, $100 payment to the Substance Abuse Education Fund, $520 restitution to Lehigh Valley Health Network and 10 hours community service. Prosecutors withdrew a charge of no rear lights.

Amber L. Faust, 30, of Schuylkill Haven; improper furnishing of drug-free urine; 12 months probation consecutive to her current sentence and $50 CJEA payment.

Heather L. Horbach, 41, of Gordon; DUI; 30 days in prison, 90 days house arrest with electronic monitoring, 30 days alcohol monitoring, seven months strict supervision, four years probation, $1,500 fine, $300 SAEF payment, $50 bench warrant fee, $400 restitution to Lehigh Valley Health Network and 20 hours community service. Prosecutors withdrew a charge of improper driving without headlights.

Diandre E. Williams, 39, of Pottsville; criminal trespass; $100 fine. Prosecutors withdrew charges of defiant trespass and public drunkenness.

A Ringtown motorist will spend time behind bars after a Schuylkill County judge sentenced him Thursday on a driving under the influence charge stemming from an incident in February 2018 in Frackville.

Martin J. Reese, 67, must serve 30 days in prison, President Judge William E. Baldwin decided.

In addition, Baldwin sentenced Reese to spend 90 days on house arrest with electronic monitoring, 30 days on alcohol monitoring, seven months on strict supervision and four years on probation, pay costs, a $1,500 fine, $300 to the SAEF and $120 restitution to Lehigh Valley Health Network, and perform 20 hours community service. Baldwin made the sentence effective at 9 a.m. Feb. 28.

Reese pleaded guilty on Jan. 11 to DUI. Frackville police had alleged Reese was DUI on Feb. 18, 2018.

Also on Thursday, Baldwin placed Douglas C. Starkey, 62, of Pottsville, on probation for 12 months and 30 days, and also sentenced her to pay costs, $300 in fines and a $100 SAEF payment.

Starkey pleaded guilty on Jan. 9 to possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving unregistered vehicle, operating vehicle without valid inspection and using improper class of license. East Union Township police had charged him with committing his crimes on Aug. 20, 2018, in the township.

In another recent county court case, Kory M. Aungst, 37, of Pine Grove, pleaded no contest to delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance, with prosecutors withdrawing a charge of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance.

Judge Charles M. Miller accepted the plea and, pursuant to an agreement between prosecutors and the defendant, sentenced Aungst to serve three to 23 months in prison, plus an additional year on probation, pay costs, a $100 SAEF payment, $50 to the CJEA and $176 restitution to the state police crime laboratory in Harrisburg, and submit a DNA sample to law enforcement authorities.

Hegins Township police charged Aungst with committing his crimes on July 25, 2016, in the township.

By pleading no contest, Aungst did not admit committing the crimes, but offered no defense to them, acknowledged prosecutors could produce sufficient evidence to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and agreed to be sentenced as if he had been convicted or been found guilty.

Also in the county court, David M. Brown, 35, of Ashland, pleaded guilty to DUI, possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and DUI while suspended. Prosecutors withdrew an additional count of possession of a controlled substance and a charge of possession of prohibited offensive weapon.

Miller sentenced Brown to serve one to five years in a state correctional institution, pay costs, a $2,500 fine, a $100 SAEF payment, a $50 CJEA payment, $176 restitution to the state police crime laboratory in Bethlehem and $400 restitution to Lehigh Valley Health Network. He made the sentence concurrent with Brown’s Northumberland County sentence.

State police at Frackville alleged Brown was DUI, and possessed drugs and paraphernalia, on July 10, 2017, in Gilberton.

In another recent county case, James J. Culbert, 46, of Pottsville, pleaded guilty to two counts of disorderly conduct, with prosecutors withdrawing three counts each of retail theft and conspiracy.

Miller sentenced Culbert to pay costs and $200 in fines.

State police at Schuylkill Haven charged Culbert with being disorderly on June 7, 2017, and again on Jan. 24, 2018. Each incident occurred in North Manheim Township.

All defendants who were sentenced must pay costs as a part of their sentences.

Contact the writer: pbortner@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6014

Properties transferred from City of Pottsville to Redevelopment Authority

$
0
0

POTTSVILLE — The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Pottsville voted to accept two parcels of property the city council transferred to it recently.

The city council voted at its Feb. 11 meeting to give 410 W. Norwegian St. and 815 Minersville St. to the authority. Both are vacant lots and the second one is a parcel the city was going to give to Schuylkill Women in Crisis. The Minersville Street property was recently demolished and will still be given to SWIC. There are no plans for the other property, he said.

City Administrator Thomas A. Palamar said it is easier administratively to have the properties go to the authority. The authority was in executive session for about 45 minutes prior to the vote. Authority Chairman Ian Lipton said the discussion included “properties that are being considered for acquisition.”

As part of the redevelopment project for the city, the plan is to acquire 15 properties. The city was awarded a $1 million grant in 2018 from the state allowing it to push forward with its redevelopment project. The project will “identify a specific area and properties within the redevelopment area that act as an impediment to revitalization, assist the city and the redevelopment authority to acquire properties in the target area and promote rehabilitation and reuse, while completing physical improvements in the redevelopment area,” according to previous information available at a November meeting.

Of the $1 million, $650,000 of the $1 million grant is proposed for acquisition of land and buildings; $250,000 for infrastructure/site preparation; and $100,000 for related costs for the work.

Contact the writer: ; 570-628-6028

$24,000 worth of meth, gun seized in Gordon bust

$
0
0

GORDON — A borough man was jailed after authorities found him in possession of methamphetamine with an estimated street value of $24,000.

The seizure was the result of a search warrant executed just after 6 a.m. at a home at 411 Hobart St. by the state police Troop L Vice/Narcotics Unit and the Schuylkill County District Attorney’s Drug Task Force.

The search resulted in John Solomon Kessler, 46, being taken into custody.

Police said that inside the home they found the 240 grams of methamphetamine, a shotgun, several glassine packets of suspected Fentanyl and items of drug paraphernalia used for packaging, re-packaging and weighing controlled substances.

As a result, Kessler was charged with one felony count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance-methamphetamine; one felony count of persons not to possess, use, manufacture, control, sell or transfer firearms; two misdemeanor counts of possession of a controlled substance-methamphetamine and Fentanyl; and one misdemeanor count of possession of drug paraphernalia.

Kessler was arraigned by Magisterial District Judge Christina E. Hale, Frackville, and committed to Schuylkill County Prison unable to post $75,000 straight cash bail.

He will now have to answer to the charges at a preliminary before Hale in her Frackville courtroom at a later date.

Contact the writer: fandruscavage@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6013


For the record, Feb. 22, 2019

$
0
0

Deeds

Butler Township — John David Weikel, individually, as administrator d.b.a. of the Estate of John D. Weikel and as executor of the Estate of Barbara A. Weikel, Paula L. Weikel, Christine Weikel and Victoria Weikel to Stephen Michael Motyka; five properties; $1.

McAdoo — Robert J. and Rosemarie Branz to Cody White; 38 E. Grant St.; $105,000.

Minersville — Christopher and Ashley L. Karpovich to Christopher Karpovich; 514 Baker St.; $1.

Thomas J. Whiteash, executor of the Estate of Ann Marie Whiteash, to Michael Verbosh; 414 Kantner St.; $1.

Pine Grove Township — JMAC Realty LLC to Lindsay N. Fake; 131 Oak Grove Road; $158,000

Porter Township — Midfirst Bank to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; 108-110 S. Yohe St., Reinerton; $1.

Pottsville — Robert L. Miller Jr. and Ida M. Schiaroli, co-executors of the Estate of Sonia Kay Flicker-Miller, to Robert L. Miller Jr.; 1921 W. Market St.; $1.

Andrea N. Dougherty to Damian Campasano; 307 W. Norwegian St.; $13,000.

Shenandoah — Elizabeth Aybar to Angelina E. Peralta; 232 W. Coal St.; $1.

South Manheim Township — Ultra LLC to Howard and Patricia Holanchock; 2600 Crow Foot Drive, Lake Wynonah; $194,500.

David R. and Carol Ann Kraft to Edward C. and Krista M. Renenger; 2613 Wynonah Drive, Lake Wynonah; $370,000.

Tamaqua — Dana M. MacDonald to Gary E. Smith Jr.; 404 1/2 Arlington St.; $60,000.

Wayne Township — Michael F. Moyer and Stephanie M. Moyer to Stephanie M. Moyer; 142 Navajo Drive, Lake Wynonah; $1.

West Brunswick Township — Douglas K. Krebs, executor of the Estate of Linda J. Krebs, to Seth R. Huey; 14 Maple Road; $1.

West Penn Township and East Penn Township, Carbon County — M. Susan Richman and Leah Hardenbergh, co-executrices of the Estate of Florence C. Steigerwalt, to Florence C. Steigerwalt Farmland LLC; 23.623-acre property on Route 895, Andreas; $1.

Marriage

Michael Morgalo, Huntingdon, and Shiann P. Roberts, Philadelphia.

Robert J. Shore, Shenandoah, and Barbara Ann Busila, Shenandoah.

Divorces granted

Santana L. Lucas, Valley View, from Kyle Lucas, Valley View.

Heather Bishop, Pottsville, from David Bishop Jr., East Greenville.

Cardboard box derby challenges racers to build unique sleds

$
0
0

A quick trip to the craft store can help competitors slide into the winners’ circle.

The fourth annual Cardboard Box Derby, hosted by Times-Shamrock Communications radio station Rock 107 and Montage Mountain Resorts, challenges competitors to build sleds out of, yes, cardboard boxes for a chance to win more than $2,000 in prizes.

The event will take place at 7:30 a.m. Sunday at the resort, 1000 Montage Mountain Road, Scranton. Check-in begins at 7:30 a.m., and the first sled launches at 10:30.

“Every year it grows and we get bigger and better sleds. Some of our participants must spend hundreds of hours on this,” said Mark Hoover, Rock 107 promotions director.

Participants 10 and older can compete to build a sled that can cross the finish line with the most people inside or is the best concept sled, best Montage Mountain-themed sled or “epic fail” sled. Racers can only use four materials — tape, glue, string and cardboard — to create their sled, which must be 7-feet-wide or less. They also can use non-structural decorations — such as paint, Christmas lights and garland — to add a little character.

“This year we are looking for originality,” Hoover said. “Last year we had an ‘Animal House’ sled.”

Racers who cross the finish line from top to bottom with no restart or pushing on the course from any team members can win top prizes — Montage season memberships, gift cards and a variety of Montage vouchers.

Spectators can join the cold-weather fun at a snow-tubing party from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Refreshments including coffee, waffles, burgers, hot dogs and adult beverages will be available.

“I can’t wait to see what shows up this year on the slopes,” Hoover said. “And if you are working on a sled, please keep it a surprise.”

Contact the writer: lifestyles@timesshamrock.com; 570-348-9127

Craft Brew Fest set for Saturday at Walk In Art Center

$
0
0

A bushel of brewers is coming to a southern Schuylkill County community this weekend to demonstrate the artistry of, and their dedication to, their craft — craft beer, that is. And they will pour the event’s proceeds into a local nonprofit.

The fourth annual Craft Brew Fest, sponsored by Our Haven Foundation, will provide a bazaar of beers from 2 to 5 p.m. Saturday at Walk In Art Center, 220 Parkway, Schuylkill Haven, according to Vicky Norris, OHF member in charge of fundraising. Tickets are $30 in advance and $35 at the door, she said. Advance tickets can be bought through the Walk In Art Center’s website, www.walkinartcenter.org; at Lewis’ General Store, 22 E. Main St., Schuylkill Haven; and Country Beverage, 107 Route 183, Schuylkill Haven. Designated driver tickets are $10.

“We invite craft brewers to come and showcase their craft beer,” Norris said, adding that it’s more than a beer tasting; it’s an educational experience for beer lovers who are keen to learn more about the ingredients, the brewing company’s history or even how a certain brew got its (often whacky) name.

More than 20 brewers are set to attend, including six from the region: the well-known Yuengling Brewery, Pottsville; and the budding, perhaps lesser known, Pilger Ruh Brewing, Pine Grove; 1787 Brewing, Hamburg; Sharp Mountain Brewing, Pottsville; Bonsai Brewing, Hegins; and Revere Brewing, Tamaqua. Others set to attend are: Troegs Brewing, Flying Fish, Yards, Victory Brewing, Fat Head Brewery, Downeast Cider, Floyd’s Spiked Beverages, Goose Island Brewery, Kasztelan Brewery, Evolution Craft Brewing Company, McAllister Brewing, Singlecut Beersmiths, Newport Storm, Connecticut Valley Brewing Company, New Trail Brewing and Funk Brewing.

In addition to the myriad malty libations one can drink, ticket holders will also have a chance to win $200 worth of craft beer in a basket raffle, Norris said. Tickets are $5 apiece, she said.

Moreover, Norris said, an array of breads, as well as chili and soup, will be available and are included with entry ticket price. Vendors of all kinds will have other food for sale, such as smoked cheeses, pretzels, dip and beef jerky, to name a few.

The Craft Brew Fest has been a great boon to Our Haven Foundation, and in turn, has benefited the community greatly, Norris said.

“It’s enabled us to get things for town as far as the benches and the trash cans, and we have a lot of great plans on the horizon for the money we make from brew fest,” which is their major fundraiser for the year, Norris said.

The nonprofit Our Haven Foundation was founded by David Norris, Vicky Norris’ husband, in 2009. Celebrating a decade of volunteerism, OHF is “dedicated to revitalizing downtown Schuylkill Haven,” according to its mission statement.

For more information, visit Craft Brew Fest 2019 on Facebook.

Contact the writer: dprosick@republicanherald.com

Christian rock musician to share songs of faith

$
0
0

Matthew West looks at concerts as a time of connections.

Hearing the crowd sing songs back to him never gets old, explained the singer-songwriter behind hit Christian rock music. It tells him that a song means something to them or maybe helped them through a tough time, and that’s why he gets so excited to go out on stage.

“There’s a distance when you write a song and you release it on the radio,” West said by phone recently from Nashville. “They’re connected to the song. ... But then (I can) be with that crowd in person and have a moment in time when everyone’s lives kind of collide that one night.”

One such collision is set to happen at 6 p.m. Saturday, when West brings the Roadshow Tour to Mohegan Sun Arena at Casey Plaza, Wilkes-Barre. Tenth Avenue North and Matt Maher will join him for the night, which also will feature worship with special guest Michael W. Smith and Leanna Crawford.

West has earned four Grammy nominations and a Primetime Emmy nomination for original music and lyrics, received the Billboard Music Award for top Christian artist in 2014 and was named Billboard’s Hot Christian Songwriter of the Year in 2016. He has sold more than 1.6 million albums, with his most recent, “All In,” released in 2017.

“I would say first and foremost, I’m passionate about the craft of songwriting, and I take the lyrics and the music and putting the music together very seriously,” West said.

When he performs at the arena, the audience can expect to hear a mix of new and old songs.

“We’ve been doing a tribute to (the) Rev. Billy Graham, who passed away last year,” West said. “Billy Graham had a profound impact on my life. We’ve got a really powerful video presentation that goes along with that song that the crowd has really been responding to in a powerful way. ... I say that’s been one of the special moments.”

As a father, West said, trying to find music with suitable messages and that he feels comfortable with his children listening to is a challenge. But Christian music offers uplifting messages, he added.

“You can fill your stomach with health food or junk food, and you can fill your ears with the same things. ... This show’s going to bring it,” West said. “It’s going to be high-energy and tons of fun, but it’s going to be a positive message.

“People come to these concerts, and so many people are literally going through the fight of their lives. And the chance ... that I get to encourage them? That’s a tremendous honor for me and all the other artists.”

West also said he sees concerts as “mountaintop experiences.”

“It’s a moment, it’s a night in your life where ... there’s a chance to press that pause button and be reminded that there’s something bigger happening and that there’s someone who loves us enough to say ... ‘be refreshed,’ ” he said. “When people walk out of that concert, that road show, (I want them to) be reminded that whatever they’re going through, it’s too big for them, but it’s not too big for the God who loves them. And that’s the message.”

Contact the writer: cwest@timesshamrock.com; 570-348-9100, ext. 5107

Presence of health care important to county

$
0
0

POTTSVILLE — Medical and other business leaders in Schuylkill County agree that the community benefits from high-quality health care and that offerings in that field will be even better in the future.

Those leaders who met on Jan. 21 at The Republican-Herald in Pottsville for the 13th annual Economic Roundtable discussed health costs, the consequences of the Affordable Care Act, the impending opening of the Geisinger St. Luke’s Hospital Campus in West Brunswick Township just outside Orwigsburg and other issues facing businesses and citizens in the county.

Michael A. Joyce, publisher of The Republican-Herald, moderated the roundtable. Other participants included Robert S. Carl Jr., president and CEO of the Schuylkill Chamber of Commerce; Patrick M. Caulfield, executive director of the Schuylkill County Municipal Authority; Jessica Dean, executive vice president, benefits, Power Kunkle Benefits Consulting, Reading; Chris Dende, vice president, human resources, Ateeco Inc., Shenandoah; Gabe Kamarousky, president, Geisinger St. Luke’s Hospital Campus, Orwigsburg; Dr. Matthew McCambridge, senior vice president and chief quality and patient safety officer, Lehigh Valley Health Network; and John Powers Jr., chief executive officer, Ash/Tec Inc., Hegins.

The following is the text of the roundtable. It has been edited for clarity and content.

JOYCE: This is the 13th Business Review Roundtable that The Republican-Herald has held in this format. I believe it is the 54th year in a row that we have been able to present the Business Review to our readers.

Health care reform is a very important topic, obviously to all of you, to the businesses and the residents in Schuylkill County.

We’re going to have three questions. We’re really looking for a discussion.

Do you believe the Affordable Care Act has failed? Why or why not?

DENDE: Actually, yes and no. It’s forced both as an employer, and for our employees, to become more consumers and act like more of a consumer. It forced us to start looking outside and we became self-insured, so that was something that was a positive.

We did avoid the insurance tax, but the onus is on us to ensure we have affordable enough health care. We had to go with more high-deductible plans. In my view, it forces everyone to become more of a consumer and to look at the landscape of what that created. It used to be you were in a health insurance plan and you were stuck with whatever your renewal was the next year. By going to the self-insured model, which made us look at ways in which we could stabilize our costs, and also become more engaged with our employees.

We had to instill things in our work culture, like wellness and preventive care and making sure our employees were taking it. We had to take a more active role in making sure our employees do the wellness. We bring a nurse on site, doing the biometric testing and being aware of some of the conditions that could be harmful long term. It does tax the employers who are forced to do that, but it also forces us to be consumers.

DEAN: I do believe that the Affordable Care Act did get people to start talking about health insurance, which was a good thing because the costs continue to rise. Do I think that it had an impact and it made health care more affordable? No, I do not. I don’t think that the cost of claims have come down.

Obviously, the cost of health insurance has not come down, so in that aspect, then I would say yes, that it has failed there. I believe that it was more of a health insurance reform more than a health care reform, because it made an impact and changes to health insurance and how we obtain insurance. I do believe that more people are covered by health care and health insurance now than they were previously, and that is a good thing, more people covered is obviously better, but I don’t think that it addressed the real problem, and that’s the rising cost of the health care itself.

McCAMBRIDGE: I would say after eight years ... that it’s finally starting to have both a positive impact on quality of care and also it’s finally starting to contain some costs. So last week, the CMS released a report showing that the percent of GDP was 17.9 percent spent, which is flat for the first time in an awful long time. A lot of us think that’s because of improved population health management for people getting primary care rather than using (emergency departments) as their primary care sites. It’s very interesting.

When the Affordable Care Act was put live back in 2010, $10 billion was put aside to create the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. That center has been trying to figure out how to do this well, to provide high-quality care and control costs at the same time.

They finally have fallen onto some programs, these alternative payment programs, that seem to be working. They went through accountable care organizations and now they seem to have settled on bundled payments. The hospitals will get 90 days of payment for a patient if you’re having a joint replacement, it starts on day one and that’s all the money you get. There’s a lot of literature to show that is actually containing costs.

The percentage of GDP spent is fairly flat. Schuylkill County is interesting when you look at it. It’s 146,000 people who live in SC, and 25,000 of them receive Medicaid. That’s 19.9 percent of the people in Schuylkill County receive Medicaid. It’s a little bit higher than state average at 18.2 percent and lower than national average. So it’s a good thing for certain segments of the population, particularly patients with Medicaid.

I’m an intensive care unit doctor. I’ve been doing it for 25 years. An example, in the past, let’s say you have a 58-year-old man with high blood pressure who loses his job, loses his health insurance. He can’t afford his blood pressure pills. In the past, what would happen to a patient like that is that they would come into the emergency room, they’d have a stroke. That would be hundreds of thousands of, if not more, in cost to society.

Having those patients covered now is good for that segment of the population. It’s also pretty good for hospitals because in the past if a patient like that would come to the hospital, there would essentially be no reimbursement.

It’s come a long way in the last eight years. After eight years, it’s getting to where it’s supposed to be. There’s a lot of room for improvement.

CAULFIELD: I think it’s an extremely complicated topic. I don’t think it’s a yes or no question. I think you have to look at it compartmentally at each aspect of the act. Looking at the successes, in 2010, in its inception, it was estimated that there were 32 million people going to be additionally insured. I think the estimates now are somewhere around 20 million. The good news is that there are more people who are insured, the bad news is, I don’t think it met its goal. Some of the positives again, it established the 10 essential benefits were, at least there are minimum amounts of coverage regardless of what insurance you have. Some of those things include emergency service, hospitalization, maternity, rehab services. I think the studies are showing that there are more Americans that are not gaining the ability of that medical treatment because of affordability. I think the fact that there are more insured, that’s a positive. As far as the failures, I think, most notably, we still remain the highest health insurance and health costs in the world. I also believe we have the best, but I think we can all agree that something needs to change with that aspect. Some employers with the mandates have caused to think out of the box and you have to, from an affordability standpoint, regardless of whether you’re a public or a private. I think it hits all of us. It’s certainly not the goal of the act where employers are actually agreeing to pay the penalty in lieu of providing health care insurance. That’s not part of the goal. I think some of the failures are trying to instituting the penalties. I personally am just not in agreement with that, penalties for uninsured individuals. The primary reason they’re probably uninsured is that they can’t afford it, so now we’re going to try and chase that with a penalty. I think that’s looking at it in the wrong sense. Similarly, the Cadillac tax remains a significant controversial tax. To tax employers 40 percent as a penalty for offering better insurance, I think that rubs the general public the wrong way. These are typically middle-class Americans that have been paying into their insurance well before the act occurred and now they’re being taxed at a higher rate, which is going to drive up the deductibles and drive up amount of money out of their hard-earned dollars. I don’t think that goes very well with the general public where they feel they’re providing money to those that haven’t put in the time and effort and the investment to do that. I think health care and health insurance remain a significantly complex and confusing necessity. All of us in this room are primarily educated, and I know it’s not easy walking through a process. You can only imagine the elderly trying to muddle through the barrage of documents that come after you have something as simple as an office visit, so I think we need to really focus on making it more easily understandable to the general public, that’s for sure.

POWERS: It made it affordable for a certain sect of people who didn’t have insurance before, and that’s fantastic, to get people insured who never were for preventive care. What happened, though, in my opinion, is that Schuylkill County is full of working middle-class citizens and it’s full of small businesses, and that’s who got the squeeze. To bring all these people on board, now your premiums have gone up as an individual, as a business, your deductibles have skyrocketed. So now if you’re not eligible for the subsidies for the lower income, you’re in a position where you’re spending an exorbitant percentage of your take-home pay on health insurance, and in order to get a lower number there, you’re taking the risk and saying, well, I will take that $8,000 deductible, which would be catastrophic for most working families, to have to pay out $8,000 unexpected on top of a premium that’s already in the $5,000, $10,000, $15,000 range. So it makes it really tough that that group of individuals, hard-working families that have participated in the system forever, have always paid their health insurance and taken care of their families that way, to all of a sudden be hammered with huge costs that they never saw before under the guise of, well now, it’s affordable. I think it really hurts an area like ours with a lot of working families. I think there has to be a better way to spread the cost to pick up the lower income and uninsured than directly funneling it back to basically a tax on working families. That’s where we see the biggest problem. I believe that that side of it has been a catastrophic failure.

KAMAROUSKY: I agree in a lot of points you’ve all made. It was insurance reform. It got more people covered. In the state of Pennsylvania, in the years 2013 to 2016, we’ve seen a 42 percent decrease in the uninsured. It worked in that respect, but the costs and deductibles being passed on to the working-class families, that’s where the challenge is, $3,000 to $8,000 deductibles. What are people doing? What are families doing? They’re still relying on going to the emergency room or other places to help deal with those issues that they’re having .You see health care moving toward access, you see things like telemedicine, you see things like urgent cares and things like that popping up to help people manage those costs. That’s why it’s become a consumer-driven world, where people have choices and they look for that low-cost accessible option, or no care at all. So that’s what we see. People in the area, in this region particularly, are looking for that. You try to be in that sweet spot of offering services that are lower cost. But in the end, we’re still working to help those patients understand what those options are and help manage their health. From the employer respect, you see wellness programs, you see other things like that to try to help patients stay ahead of their health and not have a catastrophe because they haven’t been managing it for years. That’s what we see, and that’s where those high costs come back in.

CARL: I think that if I had to answer the question directly, I would say it has not succeeded, it has failed. The reason I believe that is I think the number one goal was to make sure that we were going to cover all lives. That probably was utopic and clearly was not achieved, and while we moved more people into covered health-care plans, there is still a large portion that are not covered. While, as the physician has pointed out, the Medicaid has definitely gotten better, and those people are probably being treated better, that’s all obviously propped up on government money and obviously all of our backs as taxpayers, so you can basically say even in that bucket of people, we’re basically cost-shifting and just finding another way to deal with it. There have been some good things that have come out of it. Covered lives underachieved. Affordability I do not think is a real positive under the act. I think utilization has been positive. I think we’re all becoming more aware. The more we have to look at costs, the more we have to look at what’s inside the purchased health-care plan, we all become aware that we need to be shepherds of our own utilization and we need to be cost-conscious. I know for myself, my staff, and, I believe, speaking for most businesses, that awareness of kind of shopping health care, the fact that each hospital has a different cost structure, each pharmacy has a different cost structure, and you can make a decision personally that I’m going to go here versus here because the cost of an X-ray, the cost of a CAT scan, the cost of a prescription is different here than there. That’s good. That’s the way the world works. That’s what we’re used to doing as consumers. Before this, health care was being taken care of by a card. I walk in, it doesn’t really matter where I go. So health care was being treated for decades differently than any other consumed product, and that was not good. But I think the basic premise, the elements that this was propped up on, many of those elements have fallen short. I think the most positive thing I have seen that has come out of it is the utilization consciousness, some wellness participation where people understand now that the healthier you are, the less utilization. Utilization, I have choices of where to go. Also, we need to recognize, while it may not be directly related to this question, is that if our system was not based mainly on businesses providing, not health care, but risk mitigation, we as business do not provide health care for our employees, we mitigate their risk. We need to understand that’s exactly what we’re doing. We’re not purchasing anything. There was a time and a place decades ago where we were truly purchasing health-care plans for our employees, but that changed. Now, it’s a matter of pick the risk that you can afford to mitigate the risk for your employees, hoping that that health-care plan is an attractive add-on to employment with your particular job. The reason that businesses do it, even though they know they’re falling short, is that to not do it would put them at a severe competitive disadvantage. But just as we begin shopping for utilization, employees are definitely also aware and shopping for health-care plans, so they know the difference between business A, business B, business C, and how much risk they are able to mitigate, and therefore what the potential out-of-pocket is, and sometimes they make job decisions really based on that. So we’re kind of losing the battle. We’re not able to pay as much as we once did. We’re continuing to pay to the degree we can for competitiveness and, at the same time, we’re covering less and less health care. So if this was easy, probably back in the Bill and Hillary Clinton era of government, this would have been solved. I remember to this day when they made this their major agenda and Hillary was on the point. If it would have been easy, it would have been solved. We’re working on it for the better part of three decades. It’s obviously not easy. No one’s to blame necessarily for the failure. We clearly are not on a successful model.

JOYCE: We move on to question two. The public does not want to give up pre-existing condition coverage, which is costly. So how do we get to reformed health care that is good for business and for the public?

CARL: This is probably the trickiest of all the questions. I would just say that if you believe that everybody needs to be insured, you’re going to come to the conclusion that pre-existing conditions need to be covered. The best-case scenario of pre-existing conditions is the young person that hasn’t aged and hasn’t had any kind of serious problems, although in the world we live in, even that’s difficult with our social habits, but at the end of the day, the younger person has a better chance of not having pre-existing conditions just by the aging process. We’re all going to have them. Of course, nobody wants those to be excluded because that would mean that your health-care coverage generally would become worthless. But pre-existing conditions means higher utilization, means, generally speaking, more procedures, more testing, more pharmaceuticals. So it drives up cost and there is just no way around that. The problem with saying that everybody’s pre-existing conditions should be covered is it’s a massive amount of cost that has to be cost-shifted or covered across the greater population. In other words, those people that have the higher problems are going to drive the higher expenses. They have to be helped to be subsidized by people that do not have those conditions, so it’s cost-spreading, cost-shifting any way you want to look at it. That becomes problematic because it’s going to drive up the basic element across the board. So to me, it’s a desire but it’s not in any kind of economics in the world usually a successful equation, because it’s just too much cost to shift and to spread across the population. It’s part of the reason why, quite frankly, we don’t have everybody under health care. It’s why we can’t cover everybody’s lives, because the base numbers are coming up too high to make that sensible because the pre-existing conditions are being spread across the population. As probably one of the most elderly people sitting at the table here, I’ve experienced in the last decade of my life definitely more health-care issues, so I appreciate when I have them, that I need to get them treated, and they’re costly. I would not want to be the person that walks into the hospital to be told that you can’t be treated because you’ve got this condition and your plan doesn’t cover it. That would be obviously difficult for anybody to accept. Everybody’s health care need and access to health care has to be addressed. There is just no question that all of these pre-existing conditions and how we treat these higher-level conditions have an affordability problem that I do not believe the business community can continue to mitigate even if it’s only mitigating the risk of it. It is definitely at the heart of the problem and the biggest thing that we’re going to need to tackle moving forward.

KAMAROUSKY: It’s definitely one of the most challenging questions here. It’s the silver bullet. Try to figure this one out. You have a complex patient. You have young healthy people helping to subsidize that population. That population is at risk. The insurance companies are trying to pull those groups so the young healthy folks help subsidize the older unhealthier folks. Trying to make that attractive is a challenge. To do the right thing, yes, you want to cover those folks that have a pre-existing condition so they could move between jobs. It’s a challenge. Those workers then are not able to move from employer to employer because there are different rules. On top of it, there’s high utilization and high costs that keep driving up the costs for those patients in your organizations. Back to the population health component that’s why we are seeing healthy programs, healthy you, wellness, to really stay ahead of it. It really comes down to managing the population health, from the youth to the mothers and babies, to the home health and to make sure that you’re taking care of yourself as a worker, as a family member, as a member of the community. I don’t think there is a silver bullet to this one. The right answer is, we want to cover it, but the problem is, the costs keep going up. That’s why we’re working toward creating more access and driving down the costs of health care. We can go on and on all day on this one.

POWERS: When I look at this, I look at the traditional concept of what insurance is. We no longer really have a health insurance system. In that, you have a large group of people. There’s a risk profile taken of everyone. They’re taken on as a client and then there’s a premium assigned for that risk level. You see that in every other type of insurance out there. The higher risk pays a higher premium. The lower risk pays a lower premium. The system we’ve turned into is the subsidies of the healthy going toward the unhealthy or the pre-existing in order to get everyone covered kind of takes it away from that traditional insurance market and makes it more of just a health-care mandate for everyone. That’s where we’re really seeing people wanting to cover pre-existing conditions, but how do we manage that so it’s not coming directly out of the pockets of other people with a lower-risk profile, and not necessarily a pre-existing condition caused by the health habits of a consumer, but maybe it was. So now is the 20-year-old healthy kid paying more for the person who chose to live a less healthy lifestyle, maybe, and took that on? Where in the past you were able to charge an appropriate premium for that. I don’t think we would take that in any other sector of our insurance world. In the auto industry, we wouldn’t say those with 60 claims should pay the same rate as those who have been a safe driver for their entire life, but we’ll subsidize that. That’s just not the way insurance works, so I think that’s a problem. I do think long term, the fact that there is a bit of a mandate to have your health insurance will eventually slow the concern of the pre-existing condition, because there are less and less people who are coming into the system. So 83 or 84 percent are some type of government pay or self pay, and new with these conditions. They’ve been now in the system, so it becomes less of an issue naturally as the plan progresses, which is good. But I definitely do believe that there has to be a way to better assess the risk versus the cost of health insurance for people with certain conditions, unfortunately.

CAULFIELD: Agreeing with some of the comments before, I certainly don’t think this is an easy question to answer. I think as humanitarians and as humans, no one can sit here at the table, I don’t think, and not recognize that it is an issue and it is an issue that needs to be taken care of. Unfortunately, it’s estimated that it affects 50 million Americans; 17 million of those are estimated as children. When you speak of pre-existing conditions, there’s a myriad of complexity. Again, some of these are children that are born with no choices. They are born into these situations and born into debilitating diseases, and they need health care. However, conversely, you do have to recognize that many diseases are caused by lifestyle choices, smoking, obesity, alcohol and drug abuse, lack of exercise, and I think that’s the solvable component of that. I think ... we need to refocus it with wellness, preventative maintenance, thinking out of the box, using nurse advocacy, nurse navigation, telemedicine, different ways to be able to try and reduce those costs to still cover that shift. It could be looked at two different ways, but ultimately, I think it’s all going to come out of everyone’s pocket. So whether it be mandated under the act, as forcing to cover pre-existing conditions, or the alternative is that it’s taken out of the act, these people are still going to need health care, so if they’re uninsured and they end up at the (emergency room), they’re going to be treated, so then that comes back on Medicaid, or the hospital has to eat that on their bottom line, so inevitably, it’s all going to come back out of our pockets anyway. That’s my take.

McCAMBRIDGE: I agree with John and Pat. I think I would add that from a hospital’s perspective, there’s something very interesting happening in the hospital world. At Lehigh Valley Hospital Schuylkill, about 63 percent of the patients who are admitted there are Medicare patients, another 16 or 17 percent are Medicaid, and 2 1/2 or 3 percent are self-paying. So 83 or 84 percent altogether are some type of either government pay or self pay. What’s happening in the space is incredible over the last few years with respect to something called Medicare Advantage. That’s being provided by insurance companies so essentially, there’s a pass-through. There’s a per-member per-month payment through to (the insurance company). Then, a senior will sign up for Medicare Advantage. By 2025, it’s projected that 50 percent of seniors will be signing up for their care in that way, through Medicare Advantage. So interestingly, when you look at the insurance compan(ies) ... they’re actually making a profit on Medicare patients and Medicaid patients by working with providers and the patients to decrease utilizations. So all the preventable utilization admissions, re-admissions ... the insurance companies are quite good at that, working with us to try to reduce that. For sure, in America, the insurance companies are never going away. This Medicare for everybody, without the involvement of insurance companies, it’s not going to happen. It’s already happening in another way through Medicare Advantage. So what we may see going forward with the costly sector of the environment is something like extending Medicare Advantage down to 62, or 61, or 63, something like that, and then there’s a premium associated with that. Patients will be happy with that. Pre-existing conditions will be covered. The patients who are having more problems ... will be covered in that way. They’ll be staying. They’ll be paying a premium for that. I think we’ll be seeing in the future some kind of solution, a uniquely American solution, that involves the insurance companies. When you look at the insurance company profits on Medicare Advantage, they’re making like 5 or 6 percent, and they’re even making money on Medicaid, 2.2 to 5.5 percent. I think they’re kind of figuring this out, and you don’t hear them talking about pre-existing conditions a whole lot anymore. As a matter of fact, I think if you talk to the big five insurers, they’ll say, we’re figuring it out. I agree with everything everybody has said, but I think we’re going to see some changes going forward with utilization. One last thing I’ll say, America in general, we’re heavy utilizers; 5 percent of the world’s population, 80 percent of the opioid prescriptions. In England, there are six MRI machines per 1 million people, in America, there are 31. We’re heavy utilizers of everything. The insurance companies are quite good at helping us get that under control.

DEAN: I think pre-existing condition sometimes gets confused when that term is thrown around. I’ve been in health insurance for over 20 years now, and on the group side, pre-existing conditions have not been an issue. In all companies, there were no pre-existing exclusions on the group health insurance for over 20 years. On the group side, it’s a non-issue. There are no pre-existing exclusions. Where it came into effect was on the individual. Prior to the Affordable Care Act, people would be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions, or people would purchase an individual policy and get sick, and they would pull the policy on those individuals, and obviously, that’s a problem. It really was an issue on the individual coverage side. The fact that they put the exclusions in that you could have pre-existing conditions and still get coverage was a good thing in order to get more people insured. The problem is, how do you associate and mitigate that risk. It really comes into effect for people that don’t have coverage. If the insurance companies can’t put in a pre-existing condition clause, people who aren’t covered, all of a sudden they get sick, now they want to go purchase insurance. Obviously, for the health insurance companies, they’re not going to be able to afford to stay in business if that’s the case. Now that we’ve had the mandate, and people have continued to have coverage, that pre-existing notion is kind of going away. We’re not really running into that. We’re not seeing that because people have had to have coverage. As long as you’re going without coverage it’s really a non-issue. It’s when you drop coverage, and you’re not covered for an extended period of time, because even with the law, there’s a grace period as to how long you can come into a new policy. I also think we need to have some type of high-risk pool for those members who are extremely high risk. Why should an employer be required, why should they have some of these catastrophic cases on their coverage, why should it be the employer’s responsibility, or the insurance company’s responsibility? I think that’s where the government could step in to help. We have prescription drugs now that are skyrocketing. I recently had a situation where an employer had a dependent child on plan where the prescription was going to cost $700,000 for the year. An injection was $70,000 and they needed 10 over the course of the year. Who’s responsible for that? Should the employer be responsible to cover that? Obviously, for the insurance carrier, if you’re going to insure that, they’re going to increase the rates overall. How do we manage those types of situations? I think those are a little more pressing than the pre-existing conditions. We’re starting to see that go away. I think that’s more of the issue, what do we do for these high-risk patients and how do we treat them? Whose responsible? Is there a way the government can step in and help with some of those?

DENDE: I think that anyone who thinks of the future of our children anyone who has a congenital heart defect, anyone whose looking to get insurance, it’s not going away. Employers are going to want to always attract and have the ability to pay insurance. A solution is, I think, what we have when we have a catastrophic claim, if there is some kind of a program that when a type of catastrophic claim, or a high-risk claim, can help insurance when you hit, let’s say, a gap of the first $100,000, can there be a program where the government can come in and help us with offsetting that so it is not an egregious penalty onto that insurer or that insurer’s utilization. There’s a stopgap. Something like that, I think, can be beneficial to not have a catastrophic claim devastate your plan and not have a 50 percent increase based on one case. It does become an issue of employers being able to afford (it). The biggest growth in our company is not potatoes or cheese, it’s health care. It is the highest growing cost. We want to remain competitive. We want to have that competitive edge. But we also know we need some type of a system ... that can make and help companies become competitive, stay competitive, for creating jobs, and also be able to not be offset by people who have whatever is going to come their way. Diabetes is growing. We have so many health issues. How do we enable that to not be a penalty, or even, hopefully, never discriminatory, based on somebody’s health? I think there’s an opportunity. I think there’s a solution. It’s certainly not going to please everyone. We are eventually going to pay for it, even teachers. Think about how much teachers, in the public, most of them are being paid almost in full, with very little contribution that they have to pay for their insurance. That is not sustainable in this model, even in our own education system in the public sector. It is something that we have to have a better process to help offset the catastrophic claims.

POWERS: What I see in the property/casualty insurance market, there are ways to cover catastrophic incidents. In the unfortunate event of a terrorist attack, there is a fund set up that everyone has contributed to over the years, small amounts in their premium go toward it, and that would pay for exorbitant claims if needed. We have FEMA out there for natural disasters, government funding. But now I see those as, fortunately, rare occurrences when you look at it as compared to someone with a $1 million health-care bill. There are very many fewer hurricanes than there are people with million-dollar bills. Now, how do you set that up? How does it get funded? Of course, we don’t want Mrs. T’s paying out a million-dollar claim, but do we also want every other employer in the country putting in an extra hundred dollars here, an extra hundred dollars there, to cover that? I see that overall number as being just enormous. If $700,000 for that poor girl who needs that, how many girls need that every year? Are there 100,000 of them? Are there 100 of them? That number gets so big. It seems to be either, alright, everybody chip in the hat and we’ll pay for this as employers or covered people, or the government steps in and says they’ll take care of it, and we all know what that means: We’ve increased our tax liability to paying those claims. I agree 100 percent that catastrophic funding sounds great, especially for some of these issues you know with pre-existing. I just don’t see a model for that right now. Again, back to a fairness issue. We want to take care of everyone, but how do we do that properly. It seems like it always comes back to our checkbooks, regardless.

DEAN: I think what we are starting to see is more collaboration between the insurance companies and the provider. Where years before, it was just strong negotiations, they’re actually collaborating to deliver better quality at a lower cost. The prescription issue, that’s a whole other field.

McCAMBRIDGE: Just a few years ago, it was primarily fee for service. The models that are happening more and more, there’s some type of shared risk with the costs an utilizations. It’s really the main measures. When patients get admitted to hospitals, that’s the number one cost, so typically there are arrangements that are more and more prevalent where there’s some type of risk arrangement. That works pretty well.

JOYCE: Let’s get to question 3. What has to happen for the reform to occur?

McCAMBRIDGE: When the law was passed all those years ago, it was an awful 60-40 split. The Democrats had 60 percent of the Senate seats and the Republicans had 40. These are all Mitt Romney’s ideas, going back to 2006 in Massachusetts. Interestingly, they ran against each other. When Barack Obama won, he basically took all the great ideas. They got it through, and it was very partisan. The problem with that is typically, when they pass a law, the government, they tweak it a zillion times behind the scenes. None of that has happened because it was so contentious to begin with. Nobody is interested in tweaking it or fixing it. I think the main question still needs to be answered in America. It’s what we’ve been talking about here. We have a general idea. Should all Americans get some kind of coverage, and what that looks like? I don’t think we can reform anything until we answer that basic moral question that they’ve answered in other countries. Once we’ve answer that question, whether this is here to stay, then we can in a collective way work on that model, so we can talk about things like catastrophic funding lowering the age for Medicare Advantage, what does a premium look like for a 55-year-old man who has hypertension and has lost his job, through Medicare Advantage. We can’t even get there because it’s so contentious. We can’t even get there. We still haven’t answered the primary question. More people are leaning toward, it’s OK for everybody to have coverage. It still has to be sorted out. We’re not going to see true reform until the primary question is answered.

DEAN: I absolutely agree with that, and some tough decisions need to be made in that case as well. Does that dependent child get that $700,000 prescription drug. Until someone’s willing to say yes or no and make those decisions, I think it’s going to be tough to get.

McCAMBRIDGE: Or, yes but that girl goes onto Medicaid.

DEAN: Correct. I think seeing the health insurers and the providers collaborate and make changes is movement in the right direction. I think we need to see more transparency as consumers. Our costs and out-of-pocket expenses continue to increase. I think consumers need to know. They need to know what the cost is of that MRI, How do I find out what the cost is of that MRI? The carriers do have some tools available, but they’re only as good as the data that’s put in, so they need better tools to be able to determine where is the best place for me to go for care. How do I find that out so I can do some pro-active shopping? Obviously, if you’re going in for emergency heart bypass surgery, you’re not going to shop around for the best value, but when we’re going for routine care, when we are having elective procedures done, how do we find out what the cost is? Again, I have higher out-of-pocket expenses and deductibles. Everyone’s facing that. How do we shop for that coverage? Same with our prescription drugs. What’s the best way to purchase our prescription drugs? Where do we go? The prices vary from pharmacy to pharmacy. For years, members have paid co-pays. They have no idea that it’s a different cost if we go to Rite-Aid, Walmart or the pharmacy at the grocery store. So where do we find out that information and how do we become better consumers? Until we’re better consumers, the costs are going to continue to escalate. Again, population management. The insurers and the providers as well are doing a better job of population management, finding people who are potentially high risks and getting to them before they’re a high risk, making sure that they’re getting their care that they need ahead of time. Unfortunately, you would think your health is number one, but not everyone is doing their part, so we are seeing the health insurers, the providers step in to try and get to people before they become these high-risk catastrophic situations. So I think we’re headed in the right direction. There are a lot of smart people talking about it. The Affordable Care Act got people to the table to start talking about it, health insurers, providers, consumers. So I think we’re headed on the right direction.

McCAMBRIDGE: One of the things about the Affordable Care Act is that they created this thing call meaningful use. St. Luke’s and Lehigh Valley and all of these major massive networks around the country, we were basically mandated to put in electronic medical records. The electronic medical record has allowed us the ability like we’ve never seen before to identify the high utilizers and then to put in place nurse navigation and those types of things. That’s one of the positive things that’s happened out of the Affordable Care Act is the electronic medical record. There are a lot of issues with physician burnout related to the record and those types of things, but overall, it’s been good for patients.

KAMAROUSKY; It’s allowed the visibility into the data pool to be able to have those conversations with payers and form that partnership. You can focus on that population that’s overutilizing, or the provider that’s overutilizing in his work as a partner, to drive those costs down. A lot of times, by not having that, they will go see one physician on one corner and have one test, and they’ll go see another one because they didn’t like the result. This is what happens in reality, they’ll go to another physician, and the same test will be ordered again, and the payer will end up on the hook for both of them. The patient will just keep going around and around. That continues to drive up costs, and so that utilization and transparency in the systems have allowed both health care providers and systems to partner up with payers and work to share that risk and work with those patients.

CARL: My final comment on that would be that we’ve come a long way. You guys from two different hospitals being on the same system is an example of a lot of progress. We still have a long way to go. We will be very well served. I know in life the universal nature of anything is very difficult. There still are a lot of health-care providers who are not linked in and that utilization will even get better the more we bring under the same umbrella so that it’s easy, it’s fast, it’s common. I think a government-subsidized program where they’re putting money into the system should have as one of its very premises ... a universal-type information system. That’s the only way we’re going to get to see the big picture. There are a lot more people going that way. People don’t want to be told what to do in that regard, but it would definitely be an advantage if you could see wherever this patient was, everything that this patient did. We’re better, we’re not great yet.

DENDE: Just to cascade on that, one of the wins was just identifying this opioid (crisis). I think it really calls out the pharmaceutical industry as well. These prices on the prescriptions, the providers and the insurance companies have done a good job. I think that’s a win out of this new act. We’ve gotten reasonable and customary charges. There’s a ways to go to get everyone universal with that. Your costs can go out of control, but I don’t think the pharmaceutical industry is there. I think there’s got to be reform. I just got eye drops the other day, they were like $250. It was just absurd. That’s one area I think I would use that good work we’ve done with the providers with reasonable and customary (charges). The other part in focusing reform is incentivizing people, companies, government for wellness. I mean it for the preventive care in making your cholesterol checks. The preventive, a lot of policies they do not charge you and I think those are good incentives to continue to really incentivize the wellness aspect of your policies. That’s one of the biggest pushes we do with our employees. We have some free benefits, take them, take the preventive care. It’s a shift in the whole mind-set of your wellness, your health. Inevitably, in the long term, it will help both the individual and companies, or anyone who’s paying this price, to be pro-active, and if there’s a way to incentivize people, companies, governments to do that more and more in our future, I think that’s going to be a big part of it, especially with the growth of diabetes, obesity, opioids, all those kinds of things. I think those are going to be huge to making that more of a long-term strategy in our approach.

POWERS: The way I look at it from a macro perspective is that there basically are a fixed number of payers, the citizens of the United States in one way or the other, and there’s a total cost, and we have to pay that. So, all this reform is, well, who’s going to pay what, who’s paying this portion, who’s paying this? If you don’t take down that top-line number, or increase the number of people putting into it, you’re not going anywhere. So if you’re not managing the cost at the top level, and figuring out how that will be shared, whether it’s equally or by risk profile, we’ve failed. So when we look at costs, we have five times to six times more MRI machines that someone in London would have. I know a lot of that is we have maybe hypochondriacs or people who like to be tested, but I guarantee more of it is doctors really covering themselves, saying, you’re getting the MRI. I think maybe that doctor in London says, look, you’re fine, wait six months. Over here, with the tort system we have, we’re in a position where nobody wants to tell someone who really was a victim of negligence that they can’t seek recourse from a hospital or a doctor. Of course, that’s just the American way. If there was negligence involved, you should be compensated, but the way we are now, I think we really are in a system where there is so much covering yourself over and over and over again that it’s leading to this massive duplication of costs. Until we get that under control, whether the hospital system does it, but really it’s the tort reform, it’s the legal system, are we going to allow that to happen. Otherwise, costs will keep skyrocketing and that’s just the way it is. Then, we just have to figure out who pays. So I think on the reform side, there’s no possible way that we can’t work at lowering the cost aspect as opposed to worrying about how it’s paid for.

KAMAROUSKY; It’s really a roadblock.

POWERS: I’m sure of that. I can’t imagine.

KAMAROUSKY: It causes a lot of issues. Defensive medicine comes into play. A patient with an issue can have the trial go in another zip code that can rule in their favor. It really challenges the system and we need to fix that.

CAULFIELD: I like to look at it at the 30,000-foot level. Ever the optimist, I think we have to take a step back sometime and look at the successes we’ve had. Anybody can Google the life-expectancy charts. In 1900, it was, for a male in the United States, 46 years old. By 1950, it went to 65. By 2000, it’s up to 76 and now, some show that we’re over 80 years old life expectancy. That is certainly attributable to our advances in medicine. I’m still a firm believer that we live in the greatest country in the world. We have the greatest physicians, the greatest universities and teaching universities that are able to garner that and continue to educate our own to be able to have success in the health-care field. Back down to the boots-on-the-ground level, which is where we consider ourselves ... I’m excited to see the out-of-the-box mentality. I’m excited to see recognition of today’s millennials, where everything is instantaneous, and everything is electronic. Just the advances in telemedicine, where instead of having to go and schedule a visit, you’re pulling up your iPad and Skyping a doctor for a lower cost and bring that down. Not that we’re trying to put anyone out of business, of course, but that’s at least a choice and an alternative. Some of the things that most people don’t know about, I think education is a huge key here, and education to your employers especially. The Blues (Blue Cross and Blue Shield) have the health stores now, where they’re offering Yoga, meditation and appointments to help and programs where you can actually visit the store and meet with a health coach. You can work with a diet plan, you can work on weight loss. These things exist, but I think it’s our job as employers to make sure that our employees know that they exist. Again, back to the preventative, I think we’ve come such a long way on that with wellness with our providers, there’s grant funding and there are grant dollars out there. We chance off Fit Bits at our annual meeting, and they’re paid for by a grant that supplied by our health-care provider. There’s grant funding available. We can use that to provide a lunch after we have a hike with our folks on a weekend. Come on out, we’ll take a hike and take advantage of some of the beautiful resources of Schuylkill County, and lunch is on us and it will be a healthy lunch. That’s not going to solve the problems of the United States health care reform, but I think we’ve got to start somewhere, and we’ve got to recognize that we can all make a difference. Where I am more versed in is our involvement in our consortium and our self-insurance policy. Transparency is our model. We see where every dollar goes. You see where your premiums are going. You see where your re-insurance is going. You see where your co-insurance is going. Most importantly, you see what your administrative fees are to your provider. I think that’s the elephant in the room. Pick a number on what the estimates are as a nation on what that percentage profit is versus health-care costs. Some of the private providers, I think that’s well up over 30, pushing 40 percent. I think that transparency is an arguable point but it’s also an attackable point that I think we can all look at and sharpen up as part of the fix.

CARL: A lot of what we talked about today starts from the premise that we’ve got to do the best job possible matching utilization with the payment system. That’s kind of the rub. We have people that are paying and never utilizing and we have people that are being subsidized in payment and overutilizing. The equilibrium in the system is kind of out of whack. If I had an opportunity ... we spend so much time arguing about crazy things in government, but if we could take a step back to before the Bill and Hillary Clinton time and say, if I was president and health care needed to be reformed, what would I do, the first thing that I would do is get the best and brightest people in a room and work on this almost with a blank sheet of paper. What we’re now starting to do is trying to tweak models that don’t work and we try to heave on top of it adjustments that still fall short, and if the root cause of the problem is still there, and all we’re doing is tweaking it around the fringe, starting from scratch is way more difficult and way more time consuming, but I think it will lead to a better result. Root-cause correction is much better than quick fixes and we always by the nature of our society want to do everything fast and dirty. The other thing is ... in almost everything in life, government are not the people that should be addressing this issue. While they may need to ultimately vote on it, and I get that, especially if government is going to fund it, most of them have little to no expertise. I understand there are physicians in Congress, I understand that there are lawyers in Congress, lots of them, too many of them, but at the end of the day, we need people that understand the system. We have a lot of those represented here today. There are a lot of smart people that understand this. If you take political bias out of it, and say we’re working to improve the health care system, and that first part, taking political bias out, is always going to be a challenge, we’re worse than we ever were with that. Government should be approving it, if there are elected officials that have to approve funding, but they shouldn’t be designing it. Just going back to the very premise, let’s pass this and then we’ll read it. We know that’s the big joke, but it’s sadly the big joke, it’s sadly kind of a lot of what happened. A document that was way too big, and even with 18 staff members on some congressional staffs, nobody read it. Nobody understood it, nobody knew what any of it meant. And so now, is that what that means, is that what it means to the physician standing that’s at the bedside, that these are the requirements that we have to meet? I think another overarching problem that is way bigger than health care, and we’ve alluded to it, is, do we believe that we need to be an entitlement society? It’s not just health care that we’re talking entitlement on . Eighty to 90 percent of government expenditure is now entitlement programs. Is entitlement really the model that we’re going to continue to base America on? Does that mean that it has to be that way also for health care because we’ve made a decision that we should just be entitled in general? Is it OK for healthy well-bodied individuals in our society to not work and still receive entitlements because they knew how to beat the system, which is all sucking money out of the system into people and avenues that should not be receiving it? At the end of the day, health care is all about putting need and demand with the supply. If we do it well, we take care of sick people. If we do it poorly, we waste money. It’s easy to say it’s difficult to fix, but we have to make some of these tough choices. You can’t have all of these people sitting out there, 20 percent Medicaid. They’re not all necessarily needing Medicaid, but they’re on it because we haven’t cleaned up the system that changes that. I’m not saying people that have no way to get health care or any other entitlement program should be told you can’t get it, but I am in favor of everybody contributing to society in some meaningful way and being rewarded so that their production in society relates to things they need, want and desire, one of which is health care. I think we need to answer that question. We seem to be posturing, moving to a more socialistic, government-pay, everybody-get, and I don’t think that’s going to work for health care, and, quite frankly, I don’t think it’s going to work for any entitlement program.

KAMAROUSKY; Our next meeting’s in Harrisburg. To Bob’s comments on access, and the supply and demand, I think what you’re going to see in the meantime, the world’s moving along here, employers are challenged with costs and we’re trying to manage populations in the middle. I think what you’re going to see is health care investing in primary care and access to drive costs down. Lower costs, higher quality are initiatives that are really on top of mind for all health care institutions, especially in this region. We’re going to see that. I think you’re also going to see some innovators come in and disrupt the market. We see a lot of work in Google happening right now, and some other things that are going to disrupt us, and government may not solve it. It may end up coming in from other avenues. Who knows? I think in the meantime what we’re going to see is investment into the access component of primary care, population health, trying to get ahead of it and educate people so they know how to manage themselves and not be a catastrophe case later in life. Until then, we solve all these other issues, we’re going to see a lot of focus on data to help drive us to that. We will also see some advance partnerships, regionally and throughout the country. I know Geisinger actually has a partnership with Walmart where they fly joint cases and spine cases to Danville. It helps the employer manage the costs. You’re going to see more higher-level partnerships. Patients won’t have a choice because they know the outcomes are based on the data.

JOYCE: I want to really thank you guys. It’s been very educational for me. I do appreciate your time. This will be part of The Republican Herald Business Review, which comes out on the final Friday in February. Thank you again.

Around the region, Feb. 22, 2019

$
0
0

Hamburg

The Rajah Shriners, Reading, will host the 57th annual Shrine Circus at the Hamburg Field House, 127 S. Fourth St., March 6 through 10. Shows will be nightly at 7 p.m. with three performances — 10 a.m., 3 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. — March 9 and at 1 and 5:30 p.m. March 10. For more information, call 610-223-3857 or 610-916-9000.

McAdoo

St. Mary Ukrainian Catholic Church, 210 W. Blaine St., will have a spaghetti and meatball-or-sausage dinner from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. Sunday. The cost is $10 for adults and $5 for children 12 and younger. Meals also include salad, bread and a beverage; take-outs will be available. Homemade baked goods also will be on sale. All are welcome.

Minersville

Mountaineer Hose Company No. 1 will have a breakfast beginning at 7:30 a.m. Sunday at the firehouse. For take-out orders, people should call ahead to 570-544-9622.

Minersville

First United Methodist Church, Second and Carbon streets, will have a soup social from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. March 2. Donations will be gratefully accepted.

Orwigsburg

Schaeffer’s Harley-Davidson, 1123 Brick Hill Road, will sponsor an American Red Cross blood drive from 1 to 6 p.m. Tuesday. All are welcome to donate blood. For more information, call Erika Croneberger at 570-366-0143.

Saint Clair

The East Norwegian Township Fire Company, 16 Sunshine St., Dieners Hill, will have a meat bingo Sunday. Doors will open at 11 a.m. and games will begin at 1 p.m. The cost is $20 for 24 games. The kitchen will be open. For more information, call 570-449-6354.

Shenandoah

Knights of Columbus Francis Cardinal Brennan Council 618, 201 W. Cherry St., will have a “Fat Tuesday” hoagie sale beginning at noon March 5. The cost is $5 per hoagie, regular or Italian. To order in advance, call 570-462-1430 or 570-590-1188. The council will also sponsor a devil crab or fish dinner on Good Friday, April 19, with pickups set for 1 to 5 p.m. Meals also include fries, string beans, cole slaw and dessert. The cost is $9 per meal. Free delivery will be available in Shenandoah, Frackville and Mahanoy City. To order or for more information, call the aforementioned numbers.

Tamaqua

The Tamaqua YMCA, 1201 E. Broad St., will sponsor “Ties and Tiaras,” its 2019 Daddy-Daughter Dance from 6 to 9 p.m. March 15. Advance registration is required and must be made before March 14. Prizes will be awarded to the three best dressed couples. For more information, stop in at the Y front desk, email zrubin@ymca-berkscounty.org or call 570-668-2903.

Tamaqua

As part of the 40th annual American Cancer Society Telethon to air April 6 and 7 from Penn’s Peak, Jim Thorpe, former Courage Award honorees are being invited to participate. Former honorees, according to a telethon release, will be asked to share their stories with viewers and encourage those watching to support the effort of the telethon. A Salute to Survivors will again be a part of the telethon. Host Joe Krushinsky will ask survivors to share their stories of hope and inspiration. To appear on the telethon, former honorees and survivors are asked to contact telethon planners through the CancerTelethon.org website, by email at gtay200@verizon.net or by phone at 570-205-2454. Invitations are being sent out to performers to appear on the telethon. Program planners are always looking for new, interesting talent and acts. To be considered for the telethon, contact George Taylor at gtay200@verizon.net.

William Penn

The William Penn Fire Company, Mount Olive Boulevard (Route 54 just west of Shenandoah), is having a cheesesteak dinner sale beginning at 3 p.m. March 2. The cost is $8 per platter. For orders or free local delivery, call 570-462-0338.

Drug court participants express their gratitude

$
0
0

POTTSVILLE — Members of the Schuylkill County Drug Treatment Court expressed gratitude at the tribunal’s weekly session on Thursday for what they have and how their lives are changing for the better.

“I am grateful for the human understanding of love,” Joanne said. “I am blessed.”

Schuylkill County officials started the drug treatment court in 2017 to try to combat the widespread local drug addiction problem, using a carrot-and-stick approach to help participants beat their addictions. Other counties in Pennsylvania also have instituted drug treatment courts.

Program participants must undergo substance abuse treatment, make regular court appearances, submit to random drug testing and home visits, meet with probation officers and comply with directives from the court and those officers. Participants must complete all five phases in order to graduate from the program; graduation is the carrot, resulting in dismissal of the charges against them and completion of an aftercare program can lead to expungement of that part of their record. The program lasts for a minimum of 14 months.

However, since the participants tender guilty pleas to the charges against them, failure to complete the drug treatment court program is the stick, resulting in their pleas being accepted and the defendants being sentenced, quite possibly to time in a state correctional institution.

Joanne said her gratitude also extends to the people she has met while in the program, since they have helped her get through some difficult times.

“I am grateful for the new people in my life. Pray for me,” she said. “They all keep me focused. I am grateful to be clean and sober.”

Kody also said he has much for which to be grateful in his life.

“My life, my family, good health, good friends and my job” head his list of things, he said.

Kody said his family is especially important because of their backing in his tough times.

Contact the writer: pbortner@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6014


District court, Feb. 22, 2019

$
0
0

Christina E. Hale

FRACKVILLE — A former Frackville man charged with having contact with a 7-year-old girl in April had charges against him held for court during a preliminary hearing before Magisterial District Judge Christina E. Hale.

Anthony Faiola, 43, of 21 E. Centre Ave., Myerstown, formerly of 110 S. Lehigh Ave., Frackville, was arrested by Frackville police Patrolman Devin Buccieri and charged with one felony count of corruption of minors and one misdemeanor count each of indecent assault of a person under the age of 13 and endangering the welfare of children.

Hale determined the commonwealth proved a prima facie case and ordered all three charges against Faiola held for Schuylkill County Court.

Buccieri said Faiola would make the child watch child pornography and told her she could not tell anyone because he would go to jail.

Faiola touched the girl inappropriately and also inappropriately touched her while she was in the shower, Buccieri said.

Other court cases included:

Michael J. McGinley Jr., 37, of 522 W. Morris St., Frackville; waived for court: strangulation, simple assault, disorderly conduct and harassment.

Karen M. Uhrie, 53, of 211 N. Lloyd St., Shenandoah; waived for court: bar checks.

Sarah E. Conapitski, 21, of 126 N. Line St., Girardville; waived for court: defiant trespass.

Mikaela G. Joshua-Pugh, 22, of 90 Ferne Blvd., Apt. 05, Drexel Hill; held for court: possession of a small amount of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Brandon Lee Mazzagatti, 37, of 156 N. Broad Mountain Ave., Frackville; withdrawn: theft and receiving stolen property.

Joshua M. Phelan, 31, of 649 Big Mine Run Road, Ashland; waived for court: simple assault, terroristic threats and harassment.

Edward F. Barnes, 42, of 1227 Walnut St., Ashland; waived for court: retail theft.

David C. Shipe, 35, of 63 S. Line St., Frackville; withdrawn: strangulation, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, harassment, disorderly conduct and contempt for violation of order or agreement.

Kayla L. Stanton, 31, of 459 W. Main St., Girardville; withdrawn: turning movements and required signals, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia.

David A. Plachko

PORT CARBON — A Frackville man charged with stealing at Boscov’s Department Store at Fairlane Village mall, Norwegian Township, on Dec. 8 waived his right to a hearing before Magisterial District Judge David A. Plachko.

George T. Chesko, 49, of 311 S. Nice St., was arrested by state police Trooper Todd Heintz of the Schuylkill Haven station and charged with two misdemeanor counts of retail theft and one misdemeanor count of theft by deception.

By waiving his right to a preliminary hearing, Chesko will now have to answer to all three charges against him in Schuylkill County Court.

Heintz said Chesko returned a Hoover vacuum cleaner valued at $99.99 without a receipt and was given a store merchandise credit card. He then went to the small appliance area, removed a Kitchen Aid mixer valued at $199.99, placed in a shopping cart and proceeded to the garden area where he parked the cart with the unpaid mixer near a register.

After purchasing items with the gift card, Chesko asked the cashier for a bag so he could return his Kitchen Aid mixer, exited the store and was taken into custody by security personnel, Heintz said.

Other court cases included:

Colby Allen Sweitzer, 23, of 528 W. Second St., Mount Carmel; waived for court: retail theft and receiving stolen property.

Joseph R. Gibas, 49, of 124 Furnace Road, New Philadelphia; waived for court: receiving stolen property.

Heather M. Morgan, 35, of 29 Pottsville St., Port Carbon; held for court: possession of a controlled substance.

Crystal Lee Matthew, 36, of 129 Schuylkill St., Cressona; waived for court: possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, conspiracy, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Robert N. Kull, 45, of 201 Sunbury St., Apt. 8, Minersville; waived for court: possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, criminal use of a communications facility, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia.

(Staff writer Frank Andruscavage compiled this report.)

Charges dropped in rape allegation

$
0
0

POTTSVILLE — The Schuylkill County District Attorney’s Office on Friday dropped all charges against a Shenandoah man accused of raping a teenage girl in 2017.

Schuylkill County District Attorney Michael A. O’Pake said Friday that prosecutors decided to drop the charges because the victim did not want to proceed.

“In crimes of this nature, more often than not, the victim in the case is the primary person that is going to testify and we rely on the evidence that she gives to us to present to a jury should it come to that point,” the district attorney said.

Leroy J. Knapp, 43, of 120 S. Jardin St., was charged May 28, 2018, with two felony counts each of rape, statutory sexual assault by a person 11 years older, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse of a person under the age of 16 and sexual assault; one felony count each of corruption of minors, endangering the welfare of children and another sexual offense; and two misdemeanor counts each of indecent assault of a person under the age of 16 and indecent exposure.

Then Schuylkill County Detective Leo Securda said the incidents that led to the charges happened between May 3 and Sept. 11, 2017 and involved a 15-year-old girl.

Securda said the teenager reported that Knapp would sexually assault her at locations in Shenandoah and Pottsville and that he also threatened to kill her if she told anyone.

At a preliminary hearing in August, Knapp’s attorney, Joseph Nahas, Frackville, focused on the credibility of the victim and said several of the things she accused his client of doing that he said were physically impossible.

On Friday, Nahas said dismissing the charges was the right thing to do because, from the start, he believed Knapp did not commit the crimes of which he was accused.

Nahas commended O’Pake for making what he called the right decision in the case.

“Once they reviewed all the evidence or lack thereof, looked at the testimony and spoke with the alleged victim, I believe they came to the determination that charges were not appropriate in this matter,” Nahas said.

“Leroy Knapp didn’t do anything,” he added.

Nahas said he would like to think the dropping of the charges was a culmination of the job he did and also the time and effort that the district attorney’s office put into their investigation.

Simply put, Nahas said the victim could not be believed and had also made accusations of rape in the past that were unfounded.

“She is not a victim. She’s not, she was never a victim,” Nahas said.

He said Knapp was trying to get the girl on the right path in life and put stipulations and restrictions on her that she did not want.

“No good deed goes unpunished and that’s what happened to Leroy Knapp,” Nahas said.

O’Pake said the victim indicated to his office that she does not want to proceed with the charges,

“It was her desire not to move forward and that’s why we withdrew the charges,” he said.

Contact the writer: fandruscavage@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6013

Suspended student files lawsuit against Pottsville

$
0
0

POTTSVILLE — One of the students suspended for an alleged incident at Pottsville Area High School filed a federal lawsuit on Friday seeking to overturn his sanction.

Identified only as K.S., the 11th-grader alleged that school officials imposed an “arbitrary and capricious” 10-day out-of-school suspension without a full hearing and in spite of the fact that no one identified him as one of the alleged perpetrators of harassment.

“The (district) did not call any witnesses and did not present any statements to K.S. or his parents,” the lawsuit, filed by Pottsville lawyers Albert J. Evans and Eric M. Prock, reads in part. “There is no credible evidence that provides any basis for a harassment charge against K.S.”

Furthermore, the district did not allow K.S. to present all of his witnesses during the hearing, according to the lawsuit.

K.S. asked U.S. District Court to issue a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction barring the district from continuing to enforce the suspension. He also asked the court to hold a hearing on Monday concerning the matter.

In the complaint filed with the motion for the order and injunction, K.S. asked to be awarded compensatory and punitive damages, costs and attorney’s fees. Additionally, he requested reversal of the suspension, reinstatement as a student and removal of any mention of discipline from his record, and demanded a jury trial of the case after the hearing on the order and injunction request.

In his request for the order and injunction, K.S. said the district acted on an anonymous letter alleging improper conduct by junior members of Pottsville Area’s football team. K.S. denied any improper conduct when interviewed and, although other interviews revealed contradictory information, none of it involved any rules violations, he alleged.

Nevertheless, the district alleged at a Feb. 11 meeting that K.S. danced, with or without a towel, in the locker room near the alleged victim, who is a 25-year-old man, according to the lawsuit. The district imposed the suspension the next day and affirmed it at an informal hearing on Feb. 14 in spite of not presenting any evidence of K.S.’ s culpability, the lawsuit reads in part.

“K.S. denied the allegations and continues to deny the allegations,” the lawsuit reads in part.

In fact, even the alleged victim has not corroborated any allegations against K.S., nor has he refused to associate with him, according to the lawsuit.

“It is believed and therefore averred the alleged victim never made any allegation of improper conduct against K.S.,” the lawsuit reads in part.

He also alleged that he is likely to succeed in his lawsuit for the following reasons:

• The district’s policy defines harassment as conduct creating “an intimidating, threatening or abusive educational environment,” interfering with “an individual’s academic performance” or affecting “an individual’s learning opportunities.” Since the alleged victim is not a student, any conduct, even if true, did not constitute harassment because it did not affect any of those three.

• The district violated K.S.’s due process rights because he had no opportunity to cross-examine witnesses or see the contents of the statements against him.

• The district violated his equal protection rights by acknowledging and citing on an anonymous complaint when it had never done so in the past, punishing him more harshly than other students accused of similar activity and not allowing him full access to all evidence.

• The district violated his constitutional rights because dancing is protected by the First Amendment except in narrow circumstances not present in the situation alleged.

“There was no rational basis for treating K.S. differently from other, similarly situated students,” according to the lawsuit.

Furthermore, according to K.S., the district never provided him with a copy if the report it was required to file in the matter.

He also alleged that enjoining enforcement of the suspension prevents irreparable harm by getting him back in school, preventing him from missing sports and other extracurricular events, keeping the event on his record and interfering with his attempts to be admitted to, or gain scholarship aid for, college.

On Friday, Evans declined to comment on the case beyond what was alleged in the lawsuit documents.

Pottsville Area Superintendent Jeffrey S. Zwiebel said on Friday that the only comment he could make on the matter was that previous reports on the matter had incorrectly stated that it involved a mentally disabled student.

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert D. Mariani, Scranton.

Contact the writer: pbortner@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6014

Deeds

$
0
0

Deeds

Cass Township — Chester F. and Maria A. Bartush to Stephen Wall; 19 Rose Lane; $125,000.

Chester F. and Maria A. Bartush to Stephen Wall; property on Rose Lane; $100.

East Union Township — Eagle Rock Resort Co. to Mary J. and Manolito S. DeJoya; Lot 151WSS, Eagle Rock; $40,299.

Foster Township — Cheryl A. Cassarella to Jeffrey J. and Melissa L. Beauvais; 4 Hall Road, Buck Run; $70,000.

Mahanoy Township — Puerta Al Cielo to Puerta Al Cielo; 0.727-acre property on T-858, Suffolk; $1.

Norwegian Township — Kenneth F. Purcell to Watermelon Realty LLC; 303 Main St., Seltzer; $1.

Watermelon Realty LLC to Linda M. Wenner; 303 Main St., Seltzer; $144,900.

Pine Grove Township — Douglas P. and Catherine L. Dinklocker to Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC; easement across 208 Long Stretch Road; $1,000.

R&J Rental Co. to Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC; easement across 226 Long Stretch Road; $1,000.

Porter Township — Brenda M,. Fincke and Matthew C. Merdorff to Tina M. Scheer; 1241 E. Grand Ave., Reinerton; $10,500.

Pottsville — Margaret M. Smith to Margaret M. Smith; 1299 Oak St.; $1.

Cynthia M. Seltzer to Albert J. Yackenchick Jr.; 811 W. Norwegian St.; $34,000.

Ryan Township — Christopher A. and Marcia G. Pollack to Christopher A. Pollack; 237 Back Road, Barnesville; $1.

West Mahanoy Township — Elbeco Inc. to Converter Realty LLC; 10 City Shirt Road, Frackville Industrial Park; $775,000.

West Penn Township — Jeremy P. Cramer and Joshua D. Cramer to Jonathan C. Miller; 91 Retreat Road; $28,900.

LERTA in Mahanoy

$
0
0

MAHANOY CITY — The second of four steps in the creation of a LERTA district at the Mahanoy Business Park occurred Thursday with the Mahanoy Township supervisors providing their approval.

The supervisors adopted Ordinance 2019-1 that provides for certain real property tax exemptions for the assessed value of improvements, including new construction, on industrial, commercial or other business property in Mahanoy Township in accord with the Local Economic Revitalization Tax Assistance Act.

The ordinance also establishes a tax exemption schedule over 10 years and details the procedures for obtaining the exemption.

The Ryan Township supervisors amended their LERTA ordinance at their Feb. 11 meeting for the project.

Before the adoption vote, Schuylkill Economic Development Corp. President Frank J. Zukas spoke to the supervisors and the public about the establishment of the LERTA tax exemptions at the Yudacut Project by NorthPoint Development LLC, which is located in Mahanoy and Ryan townships.

“SEDCO, along with the Schuylkill County Municipal Authority and in concert with both Mahanoy Township, Ryan Township, Mahanoy Area School District and the county, is trying to put together a proposal to adopt the LERTA program,” Zukas said. “It’s basically an incentive program to encourage development within communities.”

Zukas said that a public hearing was held Jan. 31 by Mahanoy and Ryan townships about the LERTA request. The hearing was held in the Mahanoy Area High School and included school board members and their respective solicitors.

NorthPoint plans to develop about a 400-acre section in the Mahanoy Business Park on land identified as the Bendinsky or Yudacot Airport Parcel with three buildings as distribution centers or for other uses. The land is located near the intersection of Interstate 81 and Route 54.

Zukas said NorthPoint has a presence in the county with the purchase of the former Schuylkill Mall property in a bankruptcy sale, demolished the mall with plans to construct two industrial buildings of 800,000 and 400,000 square feet.

“They (NorthPoint) have under contract this acreage at Mahanoy Business Park with the intent to develop that into a three-building site of about 2.4 million square feet,” Zukas said. “One building would be a little over 1 million square feet, and the other two much smaller. The project is obviously a very large scale, and one of the challenges of the project is the need for a second point of access into the site, which is currently under review by PennDOT to bring a road in off Route 54 into the site so there is dual access. The Route 54 access would be the primary access, and the access off the Burma Road would be secondary.”

The LERTA Act was approved by the state legislature in 1977 and allows for a graduated real estate tax scale on commercial properties being developed, but only on the assessed valuation of the improvements, not of the assessed property value before those improvements.

LERTA authorizes second class townships, such as Ryan and Mahanoy, to exempt new construction of industrial, commercial and other business property in deteriorated areas of economically distressed communities, and improvement to certain deteriorated industrial, commercial and industrial properties in the township.

“The developer has proved to be very capable of doing projects of this size,” Zukas said. “They completed a project at the Highridge Business Park about two years and have that leased out. There are 800 employes engaged at that location. They also have multiple developments in the Wilkes-Barre area, and they have several going on in Franklin County. We have an experience factor with the company.”

Zukas added, “The site we’re talking about is going to be an expensive site to develop, no doubt about it, and the incentives and initiatives associated with this obviously would allow that company the capacity to develop the site and get occupants for the properties. It’s a site we’ve been involved with for about 20 years now. It’s not the easiest site to develop, but we believe this company represents the best opportunity for making that happen in the foreseeable future.”

According to the ordinance, the township “exempts from real property taxation, to the extent of and pursuant to the schedule of exemptions ... the assessed valuation of improvement(s) to deteriorated property, and the assessed valuation of new construction on deteriorated property.”

The tax exemption schedule on the increased assessed valuation of improvements and new construction is:

• Year 1-8 — 100 percent.

• Year 9 — 90 percent.

• Year 10 — 80 percent.

“Today’s action would be to basically try to put in the final stages of an incentive package to get the company to initiate construction on the site,” Zukas said. “They’ve obviously been actively engaged in doing a pretty good amount of engineering. They’ve already got a land development plan submitted to the township.”

Zukas said the Mahanoy Area school board is expected to act on the LERTA program at its Thursday meeting, and with the final approval at the Schuylkill County commissioners meeting on March 6.

Zukas used the tax impact from the Walmart distribution center at Highridge Business Park when the tax exemptions ended as an example of the benefit to local taxing bodies.

“Walmart is in Butler Township. The facility is about 900,000 square feet of space,” Zukas said. “The North Schuylkill School District take on that is about $650,000 a year on the building. The township is at about $140,000, and the county is a little over $300,000, so there’s almost a million dollars worth of taxes paid on that building alone. And that was a Keystone Opportunity Zone site as well. There is still a booming market for these big boxes and hopefully we can take advantage while that market is still out there.”

When put to a vote, the supervisors adopted the ordinance.

Contact the writer: jusalis@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6023

Viewing all 30310 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>